Summary estimating body fat percentage with skinfold calipers is. The implications of an error in the measurement of an exposure on measures of association with disease depend on the type of error.
How Tech Can Help Measure Your Body Fat Percentage 20 Fit
Measurement error body composition. However the impact of food and fluid intake on measurement error has not been established. Must be reduced by improving methods or equipment. Some potential sources of measurement error when using the skinfold method can mainly be traced back to human error. Measurement errors can range from 355 body fat 3. For example incorrect pinching technique by to person performing the assessment could result in a larger than actual measurement if muscle is pinched with the fat. While measuring body composition of healthy adults and older children the 3c model has shown better results over the 2c model but has to be used with caution in patients with depleted body protein or bone mineral mass as the estimated values for density and thus the final estimate of body fm will not be accurate 7.
Thus any measurement of a dietary exposure whether it is from a questionnaire on dietary intake biochemical assay or assessment of body composition may contain some form of error. These issues are part of why the caliper method is slowly going out of favor for determining body fat percentage. Abstract two three and four compartment 2c 3c and 4c models of body composition are popular methods to measure fat mass fm and fat free mass ffm in athletes. However it is important to realize that the use of any indirect method of assessing human body composition results in errors of prediction. For example using the displacement method instead of calipers would improve the accuracy of the body fat percentage measurement. In contrast a smaller 500 g meal produced only a small change in the mean for ffm and a trivial change for fm suggesting that reliability of assessment is possible with either a standardised presentation or prior ingestion of a specified 500 g meal.
Here is an example of a 7 site skinfold assessment. The usual errors range from 25 percent for predicting bf from densitometry to 3 to 9 percent by anthropometry lohman 1981. Ingestion of 1000 ml of fluid before body composition assessment by bod pod increased body fat measures by 11 13 and a meal of 500 g plus 1 litre of water resulted in measurement errors of 660 g ffm and 820 g fm. Body composition can be assessed in a number of different ways with methods ranging in technicality cost and accuracy. It measures something in proportion to the criterion methods and is an estimation skinfold standard error. The only fully accurate measurement of body composition is cadaver whole body dissection analysis previously undertaken as part of the brussels cadaver analysis study.
The dual energy x ray absorptiometry dexa is a 3c method that provides rapid non invasive regional as well as whole body composition measurement by the transmission of high. Are predictive techniques a direct measure of body composition.
Gallery of Measurement Error Body Composition
